Prediction of Giovanni Oradini [555th] vs Maximilian Figl [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W W L
Form
W W W L L W W W L WHead-To-Head: Oradini 2 - 0 Figl
They have played 3 sets in total, with Oradini winning 3 and Figl winning 0. The last match between Oradini and Figl was at the M25 Trento, 19-02-2025, First, I.hard with Giovanni Oradini getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Giovanni Oradini | 2 |
| Maximilian Figl | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Maximilian Figl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-1 ret. |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Maximilian Figl
43%
(
12 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
11 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 18 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:4:58 | Average Match Time | 1:4:58 |
| 51% (42/83) | 1st Serve % | 55% (47/85) |
| 79% (33/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (27/47) |
| 49% (20/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (13/38) |
| 62% (8/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 53% (45/85) | Return Points Win % | 36% (30/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Giovanni Oradini vs Maximilian Figl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Oradini 2 - 0 Figl
Editorial Prediction:
- Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, when it comes to the second serve, Oradini has demonstrated their prowess by winning an impressive 51.26% of points, while Figl has shown a slightly lower success rate at 46.97%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Analyzing their recent form, Oradini has triumphed in 52.78% of their opponent's points on second serves, indicating their astute return game. On the other hand, Figl has displayed an even higher proficiency with a winning rate of 58.52%. Comparing the first serve returns, Oradini has achieved a success rate of 31.61%, whereas Figl has outperformed with 35.82%. These figures greatly influence the prediction of who holds the upper hand in their head-to-head encounter.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When facing critical moments in recent matches, Oradini has successfully saved an impressive 61.07% of breakpoints. Meanwhile, Figl has proven their resilience by saving 58.42%. This statistic holds significant value in terms of making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Considering their performances over the past year, Oradini has emerged victorious in 53.85% of their matches (28 wins and 24 losses), whereas Figl has shown a slightly higher winning rate of 54.24% (32 wins and 27 losses). This provides us with an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head matches.
- Preferred Playing Surfaces: Oradini excels on Hard surfaces, boasting an impressive win rate of 63% (49 wins and 29 losses). However, their performance is comparatively weaker on I.hard, with a win rate of 56% (27 wins and 21 losses). In contrast, Figl's expertise lies on Clay surfaces, where they have won 49% of their matches (51 wins and 54 losses). Nevertheless, their performance on Hard surfaces is less impressive, with a win rate of 41% (11 wins and 16 losses).
- Player Levels: In the past year, Oradini predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize value of $10K. Impressively, they achieved a 64.71% win rate (22 wins and 12 losses) in this circuit. Similarly, Figl mainly competed in the same tier of tournaments and recorded a win rate of 54.24% (32 wins and 27 losses). However, it is crucial to compare these stats within the context of the event level to accurately predict the favorite.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: Oradini and Figl have previously met one time, with Oradini failing to secure a victory, while Figl emerged triumphant. The players have contested a total of one set, with Oradini winning one set and Figl failing to win any. Their most recent encounter took place at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula on October 23, 2023, on a Clay court where Giovanni Oradini emerged victorious with a 6-1 result.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: On average, previous head-to-head matches between these players have lasted approximately 49 minutes.
- Deciding Set H2H Prediction: In their previous encounters, Oradini and Figl have played a deciding set a total of zero times, with neither player securing a victory. This information is highly informative in predicting the outcome if this match were to go the distance.
- Extreme Pressure Situations in Head-to-Head: Notably, neither Oradini nor Figl has engaged in any tiebreaks during their encounters.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Oradini has faced opponents with an average ranking of 398.13, indicating a higher level of competition. In contrast, Figl has competed against players with an average ranking of 217.31, suggesting a relatively lower level of opposition.
- Deciding Set Performance against All Players: In the event that this match extends to a deciding set, Oradini has proven their ability to prevail by winning 56% of such sets over the past 12 months. Conversely, Figl has achieved a lower success rate of 37% in all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performance holds considerable importance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to examine current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. Please refer to the section below for detailed insights if they have participated in the current event. Additionally, certain players tend to excel at specific events, and this aspect should be taken into account when determining the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent statistics demonstrate Oradini's ability to seize opportunities, successfully converting 45.76% of their breakpoints. Figl, on the other hand, has displayed an even higher efficiency, converting 51.28% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This stat is particularly significant when considering in-game live betting tips, especially during breakpoint opportunities.
- If you are intrigued by models that utilize statistical methods to predict tennis matches, you may find this article quite enlightening. However, please note that it caters exclusively to enthusiasts of statistical analysis.
Giovanni Oradini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Giovanni Oradini
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Parizzia
Player
Giovanni Oradini
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
3
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Giacomo Crisostomo
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
Player
Giovanni Oradini
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
4
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Giovanni Oradini
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Alberto Bronzetti
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Michael Zhu
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seydina Andre
Player
Giovanni Oradini
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
12
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maximilian Figl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Maximilian Figl
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Mario Mansilla Diez
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Alessandro Spadola
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Silvio Mencaglia
Player
Maximilian Figl
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Maximilian Figl
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (219/150) | Win/Loss | 49% (75/79) |
| 57% (486/363) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (175/169) |
| 54% (4251/3672) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1687/1669) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1146 | Aces Total | 89 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 645 | Total Double Faults | 210 |
| 1:26:12 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 423.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 217.86 |
| 63% (12230/19565) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2559/4006) |
| 69% (8447/12230) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1521/2559) |
| 50% (3630/7333) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (661/1447) |
| 42% (832/1993) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (189/411) |
| 40% (7863/19547) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1592/3865) |
| 59% (216/365) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (74/149) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (49/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (20/34) |
| 56% (64/115) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (16/41) |
| 88% (212/187) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (79/68) |
| 12% (212/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (79/10) |
| 20% (157/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (75/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
